[RFC][PATCH 0/3] Kernel memory accounting container
xemul at openvz.org
Thu Aug 30 02:32:22 PDT 2007
Long time ago we decided to start memory control with the
user memory container. Now this container in -mm tree and
I think we can start with (at least discussion of) the
First of all - why do we need this kind of control. The major
"pros" is that kernel memory control protects the system
from DoS attacks by processes that live in container. As our
experience shows many exploits simply do not work in the
container with limited kernel memory.
I can split the kernel memory container into 4 parts:
1. kmalloc-ed objects control
2. vmalloc-ed objects control
3. buddy allocated pages control
4. kmem_cache_alloc-ed objects control
the control of first tree types of objects has one peculiarity:
one need to explicitly point out which allocations he wants to
account and this becomes not-configurable and is to be discussed.
On the other hands such objects as anon_vma-s, file-s, sighangds,
vfsmounts, etc are created by user request always and should
always be accounted. Fortunately they are allocated from their
own caches and thus the whole kmem cache can be accountable.
This is exactly what this patchset does - it adds the ability
to account for the total size of kmem-cache-allocated objects
from specified kmem caches.
This is based on the SLUB allocator, Paul's containers and the
resource counters I made for RSS controller and which are in
-mm tree already.
To play with it, one need to mount the container file system
with -o kmem and then mark some caches as accountable via
As I have already told kmalloc caches cannot be accounted easily
so turning the accounting on for them will fail with -EINVAL.
Turning the accounting off is possible only if the cache has
no objects. This is done so because turning accounting off
implies unaccounting of all the objects in the cache, but due
to full-pages in slub are not stored in any lists (usually)
this is impossible to do so, however I'm open for discussion
of how to make this work.
I know it's maybe too late, since some of you may be preparing
for the Summit or LinixConf, but I think that we can go on
discussing these on LinuxConf.
The patches are applicable to the latest Morton's tree (that
without the RSS controll) with the resource counters patch
Andrew committed recently.
I've made some minimal testing for that and the similar code
(without the containers interface but with the kmalloc
accounting) is already in our 2.6.22 OpenVZ tree, so testing
is going on.
More information about the Containers