user namespaces config option
Cedric Le Goater
clg at fr.ibm.com
Thu Aug 30 09:44:18 PDT 2007
Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> Hi, Cedric, Serge.
> I have noticed, that you have removed config options for
> uts and ipc namespaces but kept one for user namespace.
> What's the policy about what namespaces should have config
> option? I thought, that the only code that is worth having
> under option is clone/destroy one to save .text size for
> people who don't need them (embedded).
yes .text size is important for the embedded people but performance
also. so if perf is not impacted and .text increase is reasonable,
it's interesting to remove the config option and clarify the code
at the same time. This was the case of uts and ipc ns.
user ns is far from complete and should be kept experimental.
More information about the Containers