[PATCH 8/9] signal: Drop signals before sending them to init.

Eric W. Biederman ebiederm at xmission.com
Wed Dec 12 04:57:13 PST 2007


Currently init drops all signals including SIGKILL that are sent to it
that it does not ignore and does have a handler for.  Extending this to
pid namespaces where we want to maintain this semantic for signals sent
from inside the pid namespace (descendents of init) but we want the
namespace init to appear as a normal process is problematic, as a
naive approach requires always tracking the sender of a signal.

By making the rule (for init dropping signals):
When sending a signal to init, the presence of a signal handler that
is not SIG_DFL allows the signal to be sent to init.  If the signal
is not sent it is silently dropped without becoming pending.

The only noticeable user space difference from todays init is that it
no longer needs to worry about signals becoming pending when it has
them marked as SIG_DFL and blocked.

This change by making the presence of a signal handler effectively
a permission check allows us to do all of the work before we enqueue
the signal, and there is no need for any fancy tracking of the
signal sender.

Which means that we can now allow force_sig_info to send signals to
init, that panic the kernel instead of going into an infinite busy
loop taking an exception sending a signal and then retaking the same
exception, eating all of the cpu time but accomplishing nothing.

This change also makes it possible to easily implement the desired
semantics of /sbin/init for pid namespaces where outer processes can
kill init but processes inside the pid namespace can not.

While it is now easy to remove the dropping of signals from individual
code paths such as force_sig_info this patch does not implement that,
to retain as much of the current behavior as possible.  The only
behavioral difference besides not queuing blocked SIG_DFL signals
are signals directly added with sigaddset.  In practice a threaded init
now receives SIGKILL sent from a core dump, a thread group exit, or an
exec shutting down extraneous threads.

This patch was inspired by a patch from Oleg and initial refined
in conversation with Suka and others on the containers list.

Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm at xmission.com>
---
 kernel/signal.c |   47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
index c01e3cd..029a45d 100644
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -64,6 +64,25 @@ static int sig_ignored(struct task_struct *t, int sig)
 		(handler == SIG_DFL && sig_kernel_ignore(sig));
 }
 
+static int is_sig_init(struct task_struct *tsk)
+{
+	if (likely(!is_global_init(tsk->group_leader)))
+		return 0;
+
+	return 1;
+}
+
+static int sig_init_drop(struct task_struct *tsk, int sig)
+{
+	/* All signals for which init has a SIG_DFL handler are
+	 * silently dropped without being sent.
+	 */
+	if (!is_sig_init(tsk))
+		return 0;
+
+	return (tsk->sighand->action[sig-1].sa.sa_handler == SIG_DFL);
+}
+
 /*
  * Re-calculate pending state from the set of locally pending
  * signals, globally pending signals, and blocked signals.
@@ -834,6 +853,9 @@ force_sig_info(int sig, struct siginfo *info, struct task_struct *t)
 	struct k_sigaction *action;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&t->sighand->siglock, flags);
+	ret = 0;
+	if (sig_init_drop(t, sig))
+		goto out;
 	action = &t->sighand->action[sig-1];
 	ignored = action->sa.sa_handler == SIG_IGN;
 	blocked = sigismember(&t->blocked, sig);
@@ -845,6 +867,7 @@ force_sig_info(int sig, struct siginfo *info, struct task_struct *t)
 		}
 	}
 	ret = specific_send_sig_info(sig, info, t);
+out:
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&t->sighand->siglock, flags);
 
 	return ret;
@@ -962,6 +985,9 @@ __group_send_sig_info(int sig, struct siginfo *info, struct task_struct *p,
 	int ret = 0;
 
 	assert_spin_locked(&p->sighand->siglock);
+	if (sig_init_drop(p, sig))
+		return ret;
+
 	handle_stop_signal(sig, p);
 
 	/* Short-circuit ignored signals.  */
@@ -1224,7 +1250,9 @@ send_sig_info(int sig, struct siginfo *info, struct task_struct *p)
 	 */
 	read_lock(&tasklist_lock);  
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&p->sighand->siglock, flags);
-	ret = specific_send_sig_info(sig, info, p);
+	ret = 0;
+	if (!sig_init_drop(p, sig))
+		ret = specific_send_sig_info(sig, info, p);
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->sighand->siglock, flags);
 	read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
 	return ret;
@@ -1392,6 +1420,11 @@ send_group_sigqueue(int sig, struct sigqueue *q, struct task_struct *p)
 	read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
 	/* Since it_lock is held, p->sighand cannot be NULL. */
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&p->sighand->siglock, flags);
+	if (sig_init_drop(p, sig)) {
+		ret = 1;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
 	handle_stop_signal(sig, p);
 
 	/* Short-circuit ignored signals.  */
@@ -1844,12 +1877,6 @@ relock:
 		if (sig_kernel_ignore(signr)) /* Default is nothing. */
 			continue;
 
-		/*
-		 * Global init gets no signals it doesn't want.
-		 */
-		if (is_global_init(current))
-			continue;
-
 		if (sig_kernel_stop(signr)) {
 			/*
 			 * The default action is to stop all threads in
@@ -2272,8 +2299,10 @@ static int do_tkill(int tgid, int pid, int sig)
 		 */
 		if (!error && sig && p->sighand) {
 			spin_lock_irq(&p->sighand->siglock);
-			handle_stop_signal(sig, p);
-			error = specific_send_sig_info(sig, &info, p);
+			if (!sig_init_drop(p, sig)) {
+				handle_stop_signal(sig, p);
+				error = specific_send_sig_info(sig, &info, p);
+			}
 			spin_unlock_irq(&p->sighand->siglock);
 		}
 	}
-- 
1.5.3.rc6.17.g1911



More information about the Containers mailing list