[Devel] Re: [ckrm-tech] containers development plans (July 10
haveblue at us.ibm.com
Wed Jul 11 12:46:01 PDT 2007
On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 20:59 +0200, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> > 2. Keep separate lists of swap devices for each container
> > - each container is allowed to use a subset of the system's
> > swap files
> sounds okay too ...
> > eventually:
> > - keep a per-container list of which pte values correspond
> > to which swapfiles
> > - pte swap values are only valid inside of one container
> smells like additional memory and cpu overhead
At the point when you care what these are, you're either writing to swap
or reading from it. I don't think it's a very cpu-sensitive path.
In any case, we don't have to do this now. We'll just be limited to the
existing number of global swapfiles.
More information about the Containers