Summary of resource management discussion
vatsa at in.ibm.com
Tue Mar 13 10:58:20 PDT 2007
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 05:24:59PM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> what about identifying different resource categories and
> handling them according to the typical usage pattern?
> like the following:
> - cpu and scheduler related accounting/limits
> - memory related accounting/limits
> - network related accounting/limits
> - generic/file system related accounting/limits
> I don't worry too much about having the generic/file stuff
> attached to the nsproxy, but the cpu/sched stuff might be
> better off being directly reachable from the task
I think we should experiment with both combinations (a direct pointer
to cpu_limit structure from task_struct and an indirect pointer), get
some numbers and then decide. Or do you have results already with
respect to that?
> > 3. How are cpusets related to vserver/containers?
> > Should it be possible to, lets say, create exclusive cpusets and
> > attach containers to different cpusets?
> that is what Linux-VServer does atm, i.e. you can put
> an entire guest into a specific cpu set
Interesting. What abt /dev/cpuset view? Is that same for all containers
or do you restrict that view to the containers cpuset only?
More information about the Containers