+ remove-the-likelypid-check-in-copy_process.patch added to -mm tree

Eric W. Biederman ebiederm at xmission.com
Sat Mar 17 11:54:11 PDT 2007


Oleg Nesterov <oleg at tv-sign.ru> writes:

> Yes! I meant we should change INIT_SIGNALS(), currently it does
>
> 	#define INIT_SIGNALS(sig) {
> 		...
> 		.pgrp           = 1,
> 		{ .__session      = 1},
>
> and this confuses (I think) set_special_pids(1,1) above. Because
> __set_special_pids() still deals with pid_t, not "struct pid".
>
> Unless I missed something, we should kill these 2 initializations
> above.

Got it.  I agree we should initialize those fields to 0.

Sukadev you want to get that?

Eric



More information about the Containers mailing list