[DRAFT] Container mini-summit notes v0.01

[Eric W. Biederman]

"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue at us.ibm.com> writes:

> Sorry, I was focusing on the virtual server needs.
>
> devpts is it's own fs so I was fully expecting to make it mountable
> multiple times so a container can have it's own /dev/pts/0.  So what
> other virtual devices would we want to be able to rec-reate for a
> migrated application?  (I wonder (a) what gregkh will say about having
> a device namespace, and (b) what the sysfs implications will be)

Depends.  There are things like the loop device that could be interesting.
There may be some others.  I haven't looked at it enough detail to get
beyond the fact that in some sense it isn't just limited to pts devices.

A multimount devpts is interesting though.

Eric