[Devel] Re: [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure

Srivatsa Vaddagiri vatsa at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Mon Sep 10 21:44:43 PDT 2007


On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 11:38:10AM -0700, Paul Menage wrote:
> By definition any container (about to be renamed control group)
> subsystem is some kind of "controller" so that bit seems a bit
> redundant.
> 
> Any reason not to just call it "cpu" or "cpu_sched"

Done (in the latest patch I sent a while back)!

-- 
Regards,
vatsa


More information about the Containers mailing list