viro at ZenIV.linux.org.uk
Fri Aug 1 12:35:05 PDT 2008
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 12:23:44PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-08-01 at 11:12 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > 1. /dev/ptmx would have to change to a symlink, ptmx -> pts/ptmx.
> > I worry #1 would have substantial user-space impact, but I don't see a
> > way around it, since there would be no obvious way to associate
> > /dev/ptmx with a filesystem.
> Are your worries just about replacing what is now a normal file with a
> symlink, and the behavioral changes that come with that?
> I wonder if using a bind mount for the file would be more robust. We
> wouldn't, of course, be able to do it persistently, but I bet it would
> be something we could count on udev to do for us.
Not on my boxen. However, devpts tends to be mounted by initscripts,
which is where one would naturally do that.
More information about the Containers