Wed Aug 6 10:34:37 PDT 2008
of dm-ioband into the block layer.
On the other hand, we should know it will make it impossible to use
the dm infrastructure from the controller, though it isn't so rich.
> - If the I/O tracking patches make it into the kernel we could move on
> and try to get the Cgroup extensions to CFQ and AS mentioned before (see
> (1), (2), and (3) above for details) merged.
> - Delegate the task of controlling the rate at which a task can
> generate dirty pages to the memory controller.
> This RFC is somewhat vague but my feeling is that we build some
> consensus on the goals and basic design aspects before delving into
> implementation details.
> I would appreciate your comments and feedback.
> - Fernando
More information about the Containers