[PATCH] cgroup(fix critical bug): new handling for tasks file
menage at google.com
Tue Aug 26 15:40:48 PDT 2008
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 10:22 PM, Lai Jiangshan <laijs at cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>> But improving the current code has been on my todo list for a while.
>> My thought on the best way to fix it is to use a proper seq_file -
>> that would remove the issues that you have currently with the
>> "unconsumed" portion of the output.
> But for my poor knowledge we always have to handle "unconsumed portion"
> for nonseekable file in all different way. In my binary search based
> solving, I have to handle unconsumed part for a pid and bring in
> some complicated. This is really a disadvantage as you pointed out.
I meant that the seq_file code could handle the "unconsumed" portion
for you, rather than you having to manage it explicitly.
More information about the Containers