[patch 9/9] unprivileged mounts: add "no submounts" flag
Serge E. Hallyn
serue at us.ibm.com
Tue Jan 15 05:47:19 PST 2008
Quoting Miklos Szeredi (miklos at szeredi.hu):
> > Why not "nosubmnt"?
> Why not indeed. Maybe I should try to use my brain sometime.
Well it really should have 'user' or 'unpriv' in the name
somewhere. 'nosubmnt' is more confusing than 'nomnt' because
it no submounts really sounds like a reasonable thing in
But I never win naming arguments, so I accept that I have poor
naming judgement :)
More information about the Containers