[Devel] Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Resend - Use procfs to change a syscall behavior
Nadia.Derbey at bull.net
Thu Jul 10 02:38:45 PDT 2008
Paul Menage wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 12:58 AM, Nadia Derbey <Nadia.Derbey at bull.net> wrote:
>>Actually, what I've started working on these days is replace the proc
>>interface by a syscall to set the next_syscall_data field: I think this
>>might help us avoid defining a precise list of the new syscalls we need?
> Isn't that just sys_indirect(), but split into two syscall invocations
> rather than one?
Yes, from what I've read about the sys_indirect(), it is.
Unfortunalty, I hadn't followed the thread, so except because of its
"ugliness" (again ;-) ) I don't exactly know why the idea has been given up.
More information about the Containers