[RFC][PATCH 2/4] res_counter check usage under val

Pavel Emelyanov xemul at openvz.org
Tue Jul 29 19:09:06 PDT 2008


> I get your point. Logically this lock is unnecessary.
> (And seems this patch itself is buggy..(maybe refresh miss))
> 
> BTW, I'm sorry if I misunderstand. unsigned long long (on x86-32)
> can be compared safely ? 

Oops... Indeed. 
That discourages me, that we need a spinlock for simple comparisons :(


More information about the Containers mailing list