[PATCH 20/38] netns ct: NOTRACK in netns
jengelh at medozas.de
Thu Sep 4 21:18:06 PDT 2008
On Thursday 2008-09-04 22:58, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
>In conntrack_mt_v0() "ct->status" can be used even for untracked connection,
>is this right?
>For example, does setting IPS_NAT_DONE_MASK and IPS_CONFIRMED_BIT on
>untracked conntracked really necessary?
Does it even happen? Something smells afoul if ct->status is anything
but zero/unset for the untracked entry.
More information about the Containers