[PATCH 5/6] Makes procs file writable to move all threads by tgid at once
Louis.Rilling at kerlabs.com
Mon Aug 3 03:52:52 PDT 2009
On 24/07/09 14:57 -0700, Paul Menage wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Benjamin Blum<bblum at google.com> wrote:
> >> I don't see how css_sets are guaranteed while cgroup_fork_mutex is not held and
> >> thus does not prevent new threads from being created right now. Could you
> >> elaborate on that?
> > Prefetching the css sets is independent of the fork lock/race issue.
> > The idea is that we build a list, kept locally, that has references on
> > all the css_sets we'll need to migrate each thread to the new cgroup.
> > Since ordinarily we might need to malloc a new css_set for a thread
> > before moving it, and it's possible that that could fail, we need to
> > do allocations for all threads to be moved before committing any of
> > them. As long as we have the list of prefetched css_sets, they'll stay
> > there, and at the end, we drop the extra references we took on them to
> > make that guarantee when tearing down the list.
> And more specifically, since only the holder of cgroup_mutex can move
> a thread to a new cgroup (and hence a potentially new unique css_set),
> we know that once we've run through all the threads in the
> thread_group and verified that we have the appropriate pre-fetched
> css_set objects for all of them, it doesn't matter if any new threads
> are created - they'll share one of the pre-fetched css_sets.
css_set sharing is the bit I was missing. Thanks!
Dr Louis Rilling Kerlabs
Skype: louis.rilling Batiment Germanium
Phone: (+33|0) 6 80 89 08 23 80 avenue des Buttes de Coesmes
http://www.kerlabs.com/ 35700 Rennes
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/containers/attachments/20090803/5361c59b/attachment-0001.pgp
More information about the Containers