[PATCH 3/5] Add common socket helpers to unify the security hooks

Serge E. Hallyn serue at us.ibm.com
Tue Aug 4 12:58:50 PDT 2009

Quoting Dan Smith (danms at us.ibm.com):
> SH> My only concern here is whether 0 should be passed in by the
> SH> caller?  (Not sure, just wondering)
> I just figured I'd split up the 0/1 case into getname and getpeer,
> mirroring the libc calls.  I don't care either way.

Oh, sounds sensible.


More information about the Containers mailing list