[PATCH 1/8] Revert commit 8827c288feb7810185aa7c2e37537202fc709869
matthltc at us.ibm.com
Wed Aug 19 21:40:59 PDT 2009
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 08:13:59PM -0700, Paul Menage wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 8:11 PM, Li Zefan<lizf at cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > As you said, the 2 patches differ just in using different var/func
> > names, so rebasing shouldn't be hard but maybe a bit boring.
> Yes - it's a fair amount of work for no real gain.
So this revert won't introduce a regression for any potential tests?
More information about the Containers