[PATCH 8/9] [RFC] Example multi-bindable subsystem: a per-cgroup notes field

KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki kamezawa.hiroyu at jp.fujitsu.com
Wed Jul 1 20:17:28 PDT 2009


On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 19:56:28 -0700
Paul Menage <menage at google.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 7:48 PM, KAMEZAWA
> Hiroyuki<kamezawa.hiroyu at jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hmm, do we need to this "info" file as subsys ? How about making this as
> > default file set ? (if there are users.)
> >
> 
> That would certainly be possible, and would be an alternative to
> having multi-bindable subsystem support.
> 
> The advantage of adding multi-bindable subsystems is that you can
> avoid bloating the core cgroups code, by putting individual small
> cgroups features in their own code modules, and you get to decide at
> mount time which features are actually mounted; if they were part of
> the core cgroups files, then there would either need to be special
> mount options for each separate feature, or else no way to pick which
> features were mounted on each hierarchy.
> 
Sure, thanks.

-Kame

> Paul
> 



More information about the Containers mailing list