[PATCH 5/5] c/r: Add AF_UNIX support (v6)
danms at us.ibm.com
Wed Jul 29 07:49:15 PDT 2009
SH> At the moment you miss out on the security_socket_connect() call.
Is that any different than the path involved when a process does a
SH> Still your code is so customized that perhaps an explicit
SH> security_socket_connect() call in your sock_unix_join() may be the
SH> way to go...
So, when I do the join, I really should run the check on both the
remote and local addresses, right? The join operation is not really a
connect in the sense of being one-sided...
IBM Linux Technology Center
email: danms at us.ibm.com
More information about the Containers