[PATCH 5/5] c/r: Add AF_UNIX support (v6)

Serge E. Hallyn serue at us.ibm.com
Wed Jul 29 07:59:27 PDT 2009

Quoting Dan Smith (danms at us.ibm.com):
> SH> At the moment you miss out on the security_socket_connect() call. 
> Is that any different than the path involved when a process does a
> socketpair() call?
> SH> Still your code is so customized that perhaps an explicit
> SH> security_socket_connect() call in your sock_unix_join() may be the
> SH> way to go...
> So, when I do the join, I really should run the check on both the
> remote and local addresses, right?  The join operation is not really a
> connect in the sense of being one-sided...

Ok well if a join is not a connect then ignore me.

I'll set a block of time aside to take a closer look on your next


More information about the Containers mailing list