[PATCH 0/6] /proc/pid/checkpointable
dave at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Wed Mar 18 13:13:33 PDT 2009
On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 13:03 -0700, Mike Waychison wrote:
> Polluting the dmesg buffer with messages from common failures (consider
> a multi-user cluster where checkpoints may or may not succeed) isn't
> very useful.
Yeah, I've already gotten an earful from Serge and Dan S. about this. :)
Serge suggested that, perhaps, the audit framework could be used. We
might also use an ftrace buffer if we want to keep a whole ton of
messages around, too.
dmesg is definitely not workable long-term at all.
More information about the Containers