[PATCH 01/10] Documentation

Fabio Checconi fchecconi at gmail.com
Tue Mar 24 11:41:01 PDT 2009


> From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal at redhat.com>
> Date: Tue, Mar 24, 2009 02:29:06PM -0400
>
...
> > Does keeping the sync queue in ready tree solves the problem too? Is
> > it because it avoid a virtual time jump?
> > 
> 
> I have not tried the second approch yet. But that also should solve the
> vtime jump issue.
> 

Do you mean that you intend to keep a queue with no backlog in the
active tree?


More information about the Containers mailing list