[PATCH] [RFC] c/r: Add UTS support
Eric W. Biederman
ebiederm at xmission.com
Wed Mar 25 05:01:16 PDT 2009
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano at free.fr> writes:
> Yes, this is an alternative. Maybe, I will say something stupid but IMO
> the "maycheckpoint" will depends on what you assume you have for the CR:
> 1) the container is instantiated in one step, that is
> clone(mycloneflags) and that's all, any other clone/unshare is
> forbidden. In this case, you can concentrate the code in the nsproxy
> 2) the container can be instantiated in several steps, that is
> several clone/unshare but with different namespaces. In this case, you
> have to take care of all the namespaces and do a "maycheckpoint" for
> each of them.
Please excuse me for jumping in late.
unshare/clone are irrelevant. Think passing of file descriptors
in unix domain sockets.
More information about the Containers