[RFC][v7][PATCH 8/9]: Define clone2() syscall
torvalds at linux-foundation.org
Tue Sep 29 12:10:50 PDT 2009
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > We already have a syscall layer which is painful to thunk in places,
> > and this would make it much worse.
> syscalls are cheap as well.
> cheaper than decades of dealing with such multiplexer mess ;/
Well, I'd agree, except the clone flags really _are_ about multiplexer
issues, and the new flag woudln't really change anything.
If the new system call actually had appreciably separate code-paths, I'd
buy the "multiplexer" argument. But it doesn't really. It's going to call
down to the same basic clone functionality, and the core clone code ends
up de-multiplexing the cases anyway.
So this would not at all be like the socket calls (to pick the traditional
Linux system call multiplexing example) in that sense.
More information about the Containers