[PATCH] [RFC] C/R: inet4 and inet6 unicast routes (v2)

Serge E. Hallyn serue at us.ibm.com
Fri Apr 30 11:37:02 PDT 2010

Quoting Dan Smith (danms at us.ibm.com):
> SH> So I'm afraid you're going to have to do a slightly uglier thing
> SH> where you unshare_nsproxy_namespaces() and then
> SH> switch_task_namespaces() to the new nsproxy.
> Well, I think that would be hidden in the nicer helper function I
> think I'll need, which I eluded to in the patch header.  This is just
> an RFC proof that it can be done in this manner, but I think a
> separate helper in nsproxy.c is in order to make it nice (and avoid
> the extra alloc/free of the netns that copy_namespaces() will create).
> Agreed?

Yup - thanks!


More information about the Containers mailing list