[PATCH] [RFC] C/R: inet4 and inet6 unicast routes (v2)
daniel.lezcano at free.fr
Fri Apr 30 13:35:19 PDT 2010
Dan Smith wrote:
> This patch adds support for checkpointing and restoring route information.
> It keeps enough information to restore basic routes at the level of detail
> of /proc/net/route. It uses RTNETLINK to extract the information during
> checkpoint and also to insert it back during restore. This gives us a
> nice layer of isolation between us and the various "fib" implementations.
> Changes in v2:
> This version of the patch actually moves the current task into the
> desired network namespace temporarily, for the purposes of examining and
> restoring the route information. This is a instead of creating a cross-
> namespace socket to do the job, as was done in v1.
> This is just an RFC to see if this is an acceptable method. For a final
> version, adding a helper to nsproxy.c would allow us to create a new
> nsproxy with the desired netns instead of creating one with
> copy_namespaces() just to kill it off and use the target one.
> I still think the previous method is cleaner, but this way may violate
> fewer namespace boundaries (I'm still undecided :)
> Signed-off-by: Dan Smith <danms at us.ibm.com>
> Cc: David Miller <davem at davemloft.net>
> Cc: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich at hp.com>
> Cc: jamal <hadi at cyberus.ca>
Eric did a patchset (as Jamal mentioned it) where you can have a process
to enter a specific namespace from userspace.
Is it possible to enter the namespace and dump / restore the routes with
NETLINK_ROUTE from userspace ? Or is it something not possible ?
More information about the Containers