[PATCH v21 015/100] cgroup freezer: Update stale locking comments

Rafael J. Wysocki rjw at sisk.pl
Mon May 10 14:12:10 PDT 2010


On Monday 10 May 2010, Matt Helsley wrote:
> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 11:01:45PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thursday 06 May 2010, Oren Laadan wrote:
> > > 
> > > On 05/06/2010 03:40 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > On Saturday 01 May 2010, Oren Laadan wrote:
> > > >> From: Matt Helsley <matthltc at us.ibm.com>
> > > >>
> > > >> Update stale comments regarding locking order and add a little more detail
> > > >> so it's easier to follow the locking between the cgroup freezer and the
> > > >> power management freezer code.
> > > > 
> > > > I guess these three patches are for me.
> > > > 
> > > > Do you want me to handle them?
> > > 
> > > Yes, please, that would be great.
> > 
> > However, patches 16 and 17 seem to depend on checkpoint/restart and don't
> > appear to be margeable at this point.  Is this correct?
> 
> Strictly speaking they do not depend on checkpoint/restart. However, only
> checkpoint/restart uses the functionality introduced by those patches so I
> think you are correct that they aren't mergeable at this point.

OK, so I'm going to take patch 15 only for the upcoming merge window.

Thanks,
Rafael


More information about the Containers mailing list