[Ksummit-2010-discuss] checkpoint-restart: naked patch
orenl at cs.columbia.edu
Mon Nov 8 11:34:24 PST 2010
On 11/08/2010 01:37 PM, Gene Cooperman wrote:
> Thanks for the careful response, Oren. For others who read this,
> one could interpret Oren's rapid post as criticizing the work of
> Andres Lagar Cavilla. I'm sure that this was not Oren's intention.
> Please read below for a brief clarification of the novelty of SnowFlock.
Err... yes, that was careless of me. I was too focused on
getting the thread back to track. Thanks for pointing out.
>>> about live migration, have you also looked at the work of
>>> Andres Lagar Caviilla on SnowFlock?
>>> He does live migration of entire virtual machines, again with very
>>> small delay. Of course, the issue for any type of live migration is that
>>> if the rate of dirtying pages is very high (e.g. HPC), then there is
>>> still a delay or slow response, due to page faults to a remote host.
>> VMware, Xen and KVM already do live migration. However, VMs
>> are a separate beast.
> I absolutely agree with your point that live migration of
> applications is a different beast, and technically very novel.
> Since I know Andres Lagar Cavilla personally, I also feel obligated
> to comment why SnowFlock truly is novel in the VM space. First, as Andres
> "SnowFlock is an open-source project [SnowFlock] built on the Xen 3.0.3
> VMM [Barham 2003]."
> In the abstract, Andres points out one of the major points of novelty:
> "To evaluate SnowFlock, we focus on the demanding
> scenario of services requiring on-the-fly creation of hundreds
> of parallel workers in order to solve computationallyintensive
> queries in seconds."
> We must be careful that we don't destroy someone's reputation without
> a careful study of their work.
Yes, it's really nice work - I saw it when I visited there.
(Coincidentally the post-copy idea with Xen appeared also in
VEE 09 briefly before).
More information about the Containers