[Ksummit-2010-discuss] checkpoint-restart: naked patch
adobriyan at gmail.com
Fri Nov 19 08:38:55 PST 2010
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Tejun Heo <tj at kernel.org> wrote:
> On 11/19/2010 05:27 PM, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 6:19 PM, Tejun Heo <tj at kernel.org> wrote:
>>>> The paragon of absurdity is struct task_struct::did_exec .
>>> Yeah, then go and figure how to do that in a way which would be useful
>>> for other purposes too instead of trying to shove the whole
>>> checkpointer inside the kernel. It sure would be harder but hey
>>> that's the way it is.
>> System call for one bit? This is ridiculous.
> Why not just a flag in proc entry? It's a frigging single bit.
Because /proc/*/did_exec useless to anyone but C/R (even for reading!).
Because code is much simpler:
tsk->did_exec = !!tsk_img->did_exec;
More information about the Containers