netns patches WAS( Re: [PATCH 8/8] net: Implement socketat.
Eric W. Biederman
ebiederm at xmission.com
Tue Oct 26 17:27:47 PDT 2010
jamal <hadi at cyberus.ca> writes:
> If you are too busy to push these in maybe have
> someone clueful like Daniel help out submitting? I think it
> should probably be reasonable to leave out the sockeat
> patch initially if it is deemed controversial..
This merge cycle I am too busy, and my patches did not make it into
linux-next before the merge window.
Everything except socketat at seems non-controversial. socketat makes
sense to post-pone a little bit until we start converting applications,
and there is a little real world experience about what is needed.
I anticipate some time freeing up in the next couple of weeks so I
should be ready for the next merge window.
More information about the Containers