[PATCH 05/10] Core checkpoint/restart support code

[Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu]

On Mon, 04 Apr 2011 14:55:11 PDT, Matt Helsley said:

> Now we're back with a new minimal patch set. You're asking us to do the same
> thing and expect different results -- stack more patches on top and expect to
> get it reviewed. OK, but what reason do we have to believe this time will be
> any different?

Has the terrain changed any since last time? In particular, ISTR a bunch of
activity in namespace support since last time - does that change what your
patch set needs to do?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 227 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/containers/attachments/20110404/f6c6f976/attachment.pgp