[RFC] fs, proc: Introduce the /proc/<pid>/map_files/ directory v2

Tejun Heo tj at kernel.org
Thu Aug 25 10:01:47 PDT 2011


Hello,

On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 12:29:44PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
>  | lr-x------ 1 cyrill cyrill 64 Aug  9 15:25 0x3d73a00000 -> /lib64/ld-2.5.so
>  | lr-x------ 1 cyrill cyrill 64 Aug  9 15:25 0x3d73c1b000 -> /lib64/ld-2.5.so
>  | lr-x------ 1 cyrill cyrill 64 Aug  9 15:25 0x3d73c1c000 -> /lib64/ld-2.5.so
>  | lr-x------ 1 cyrill cyrill 64 Aug  9 15:25 0x3d73e00000 -> /lib64/libc-2.5.so
>  | lr-x------ 1 cyrill cyrill 64 Aug  9 15:25 0x3d73f4e000 -> /lib64/libc-2.5.so

I would prefer if the filename included both start and end addresses
so that it matches the first column of /proc/PID/maps and ls'ing the
directory is more useful.  What do other people think?

> +static int map_files_d_revalidate(struct dentry *dentry, struct nameidata *nd)
> +{
> +	struct task_struct *task;
> +	struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> +	struct mm_struct *mm;
> +	struct inode *inode;
> +
> +	if (nd && nd->flags & LOOKUP_RCU)
> +		return -ECHILD;
> +
> +	inode = dentry->d_inode;
> +	task = get_proc_task(inode);
> +	if (!task)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	mm = get_task_mm(task);
> +	put_task_struct(task);
> +	if (!mm)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> +	vma = find_exact_vma(mm, PROC_I(inode)->vm_start);
> +	up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> +	mmput(mm);
> +
> +	if (vma)
> +		return 1;

Hmm... don't we need the same credential update as
tid_fd_revalidate()?  If the task seteuid's, we want the permissions
to change accordingly, right?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun


More information about the Containers mailing list