[PATCH v6 6/9] memcg: add cgroupfs interface to memcg dirty limits
Mike Heffner
mike at librato.com
Tue Mar 15 07:01:05 PDT 2011
On 03/11/2011 01:43 PM, Greg Thelen wrote:
> Add cgroupfs interface to memcg dirty page limits:
> Direct write-out is controlled with:
> - memory.dirty_ratio
> - memory.dirty_limit_in_bytes
>
> Background write-out is controlled with:
> - memory.dirty_background_ratio
> - memory.dirty_background_limit_bytes
What's the overlap, if any, with the current memory limits controlled by
`memory.limit_in_bytes` and the above `memory.dirty_limit_in_bytes`? If
I want to fairly balance memory between two cgroups be one a dirty page
antagonist (dd) and the other an anonymous page (memcache), do I just
set `memory.limit_in_bytes`? Does this patch simply provide a more
granular level of control of the dirty limits?
Thanks,
Mike
More information about the Containers
mailing list