Is not locking task_lock in cgroup_fork() safe?

Tejun Heo tj at
Mon Oct 8 06:57:52 UTC 2012

Hello, Li, Frederic.

On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 01:46:18PM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> You're right. threadgroup lock is held unconditionally in attach_task_py_pid(),
> but it's held only for CLONE_THREAD in fork path, which I guess I overlooked
> when reviewing the patch.
> > Also, please note that task_lock is likely to be hot on local CPU at
> > that point and avoiding it there might not really buy much.
> Reverting that commit should be fine.

There are other commits which perform similar optimization

 7e3aa30ac8 ("cgroup: Remove task_lock() from cgroup_post_fork()")
 c84cdf75cc ("cgroup: Remove unnecessary task_lock before fetching css_set on migration")

Are they wrong too?



More information about the Containers mailing list