[PATCH 0/1] (Was: cgroup_freezer: don't stall transition to FROZEN for PF_NOFREEZE or PF_FREEZER_SKIP tasks)
oleg at redhat.com
Thu Oct 25 17:12:36 UTC 2012
On 10/24, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > I'd prefer to simply clear PF_NOFREEZE (without set_freezable), but
> > obviously this doesn't look exactly right from cgroup_freezer pov.
> I don't think it matters all that much. It's a pretty special case.
> Maybe define PF_CLEAR_ON_EXEC_MASK or something and just include
> PF_NOFREEZE in it?
May be... but it will have a single user and sched.h is already huge,
so didn't do this.
More information about the Containers