[PATCH REPOST RFC cgroup/for-3.7] cgroup: mark subsystems with broken hierarchy support and whine if cgroups are nested for them

[Glauber Costa]

On 09/14/2012 11:15 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 12:19:06PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
>> I want oppose it as well, but I believe part of this exercise is to make
>> the need to have hierarchy widespread. Warning on the case
>> 1st-level-only case helps with that, even if we make more noise than we
>> should.
>>
>> The reason I supported Tejun's proposal originally, is that I think that
>> if we make the wrong amount of noise, being wrong by a surplus is better
>> than being wrong by a deficit, in this case.
> 
> I think both are valid points and don't think it makes a lot of
> difference either way.  Michal being the maintainer of the code, I'm
> taking his approach for this one.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
That is fine.