[PATCH 00/10] cgroups: Task counter subsystem v8
tj at kernel.org
Mon Apr 1 20:29:43 UTC 2013
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 01:09:09PM -0700, Tim Hockin wrote:
> Pardon my ignorance, but... what? Use kernel memory limits as a proxy
> for process/thread counts? That sounds terrible - I hope I am
Well, the argument was that process / thread counts were a poor and
unnecessary proxy for kernel memory consumption limit. IIRC, Johannes
put it as (I'm paraphrasing) "you can't go to Fry's and buy 4k thread
worth of component".
> misunderstanding? This task counter patch had several properties that
> mapped very well to what we want.
> Is it dead in the water?
After some discussion, Frederic agreed that at least his use case can
be served well by kmemcg, maybe even better - IIRC it was container
fork bomb scenario, so you'll have to argue your way in why kmemcg
isn't a suitable solution for your use case if you wanna revive this.
More information about the Containers