[PATCHv3 2/2] /proc/PID/status: show all sets of pid according to ns

Serge E. Hallyn serge at hallyn.com
Tue Sep 30 16:07:55 UTC 2014


Quoting Serge E. Hallyn (serge at hallyn.com):
> Quoting Chen, Hanxiao (chenhanxiao at cn.fujitsu.com):
> > Hi,
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Serge E. Hallyn [mailto:serge at hallyn.com]
> > > Sent: Monday, September 29, 2014 10:00 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 2/2] /proc/PID/status: show all sets of pid according to
> > > ns
> > [snip]
> > > > >
> > > > > This patch adds four fields: NStgid, NSpid, NSpgid and NSsid:
> > > > > a) In init_pid_ns, nothing changed;
> > > > >
> > > > > b) In one pidns, will tell the pid inside containers:
> > > > > NStgid:	21776   5       1
> > > > > NSpid:  21776   5       1
> > > > > NSpgid:	21776   5       1
> > > > > NSsid:  21729   1       0
> > > > > ** Process id is 21776 in level 0, 5 in level 1, 1 in level 2.
> > > > >
> > > > > c) If pidns is nested, it depends on which pidns are you in.
> > > > > NStgid: 5       1
> > > > > NSpid:  5       1
> > > > > NSpgid: 5       1
> > > > > NSsid:  1       0
> > > > > ** Views from level 1
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > This patch is simple, useful and safe.
> > > > But currently there is not any feedbacks.
> > > >
> > > > Any comments or ideas?
> > > 
> > > Thanks, Chen.  The code looks fine.  My concern is that you are
> > > exposing information which cannot be checkpointed and restarted.
> > > In particular, if I'm inside a nested container, so I'm in pidns
> > > level 3, then my own NSpid info, when I read it, will show the
> > > pids at parent namespaces.  If I'm restarted at the third pidns
> > > level, only the one pid can be restored.
> > 
> > If you're in level 3, read your own proc, only level 3's NSpid info
> > will be shown. No parent namesapces info could be seen.
> 
> D'oh!  Sorry, I see, you're starting at ns->level.  And ns is the ns
> of the proc mount, not the caller.  that looks good.
> 
> So
> 
> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn at canonical.com>

Also

Tested-by: Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn at canonical.com>

as I've tested this between a few containers.


More information about the Containers mailing list