[PATCHv3 8/8] cgroup: Add documentation for cgroup namespaces
richard at nod.at
Tue Jan 6 00:17:22 UTC 2015
Am 06.01.2015 um 01:10 schrieb Aditya Kali:
> Since the old/default behavior is on its way out, I didn't invest time
> in fixing that. Also, some of the properties that make
> cgroup-namespace simpler are only provided by unified hierarchy (for
> example: a single root-cgroup per container).
Does the new sane cgroupfs behavior even have a single real world user?
I always thought it isn't stable yet.
Linux distros currently use systemd v210. They don't dare to use a newer one.
Even *if* systemd would support the sane sane cgroupfs behavior in the most recent
version it will take 1-2 years until it would hit a recent distro.
So please support also the old and nasty behavior such that one day we can run current
systemd distros in Linux containers.
More information about the Containers