[PATCH v2 00/10] userns: sysctl limits for namespaces
Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
mtk.manpages at gmail.com
Tue Jul 26 10:27:59 UTC 2016
Hello Eric,
On 07/21/2016 06:39 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
> This patchset addresses two use cases:
> - Implement a sane upper bound on the number of namespaces.
> - Provide a way for sandboxes to limit the attack surface from
> namespaces.
>
> The maximum sane case I can imagine is if every process is a fat
> process, so I set the maximum number of namespaces to the maximum
> number of threads.
>
> I make these limits recursive and per user namespace so that a
> usernamespace root can reduce the limits further. If a user namespace
> root raises the limit the limit in the parent namespace will be honored.
>
> I have cut this implementation to the bare minimum needed to achieve
> these objectives.
>
> Does anyone know if there is a proper error code to return for resource
> limit exceeded? I am currently using -EUSERS or -ENFILE but both of
> those feel a little wrong.
ENFILE certainly seems weird. I suppose my first question is: why two
different errors?
Some alternatives you might want to consider: E2BIG, EOVERFLOW,
or (maybe) ERANGE.
Cheers,
Michael
More information about the Containers
mailing list