[PATCH ghak90 V8 13/16] audit: track container nesting
paul at paul-moore.com
Tue Feb 4 15:52:36 UTC 2020
On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 10:47 AM Steve Grubb <sgrubb at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 4, 2020 8:19:44 AM EST Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > > The established pattern is that we print -1 when its unset and "?" when
> > > its totalling missing. So, how could this be invalid? It should be set
> > > or not. That is unless its totally missing just like when we do not run
> > > with selinux enabled and a context just doesn't exist.
> > Ok, so in this case it is clearly unset, so should be -1, which will be a
> > 20-digit number when represented as an unsigned long long int.
> > Thank you for that clarification Steve.
> It is literally a -1. ( 2 characters)
Well, not as Richard has currently written the code, it is a "%llu".
This was why I asked the question I did; if we want the "-1" here we
probably want to special case that as I don't think we want to display
audit container IDs as signed numbers in general.
More information about the Containers