[Desktop_architects] [Announce] "Common Desktop Infrastructure" 0.1.0 is released

[Daisuke Kameda]

Thank you for your reply.

But, I can't take the time explaining, because I am very busy
with working and preparing for "OpenSource Conference Tokyo/Spring"
held in Japan on Mar. 1st.

So, I'll send the mail in next week. Please wait.

Regards,

Kay Ramme wrote:
> Kameda-san
> 
> Daisuke Kameda wrote:
>>
>> I understood that we need to Make "bridge" for converting the existing
>> protocol (e.g. Uno) to "super" protocol and for converting "super"
>> protocol to existing protocol.
>>
>> If you mean "super" protocol as "the least common multiple" protocol,
>> our vision is equal to it. But, it is difficult to implement by
>> only our power.
> 
> This seems to be another argument in favor of re-using something already 
> there ...
> 
>>
>>
>> In the first place, in now opensource desktop community, is selecting 
>> one component technology possible?
> 
> I don't see a reason why not.
> 
>>
>> If it is possible, has not it already realized?
> As said, we in OOo have our own component model (as it seems most bigger 
> projects have :-), we likely could have implemented bridges to many 
> (most?) other component models, but that just had no priority, there was 
> no need for it from our point of view ...
> 
>>
>> Regards,
> 
> Regards
> 
>            Kay
> 
> 
>