[fhs-discuss] HA failover hierarchy?

[Karl Goetz]

On Sat, 7 May 2011 18:56:31 -0400
Peter <peter at bsqt.homeip.net> wrote:

> There are many tools, such as linux-ha, redhat-piranha, that do high
> availability and failover.  The normal FHS calls for application data
> to be in /var, but having that move onto the failover partner is,
> imo, a bad idea. I don't want /var/logs, for example not being
> available to the ha partner which isn't running any services at the
> moment.

Does this relate to the "FHS exported filesystems" post from a few
days ago? I don't deal with HA, so I don't really understand the
details here.
thanks,
kk

-- 
Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS)
Debian contributor / gNewSense Maintainer
http://www.kgoetz.id.au
No, I won't join your social networking group
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/fhs-discuss/attachments/20110508/b4f3a195/attachment.pgp