[fhs-discuss] /run ins FHS?

[Karl Goetz]

On Sun, 8 May 2011 21:53:51 -0400 (EDT)
R P Herrold <herrold at owlriver.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 9 May 2011, Karl Goetz wrote:
> 
> > I'd suggest we should explicitly require that its contents are not
> > persistent, considering the proposed uses for it.
> 
> and that was the point of the earlier thread --- This is ** 
> not ** something which NEEDS to be mandated, and so from which 
> a standards organization point of view, rather one in which to 
> permit 'local options'
> 
> If a given distribution ** wants ** the support load of NOT 
> having enough info remaining persistent to diagnose state by 
> simple inspection, on their head be it --- but we do not need 
> to FORCE all to so suffer

hm, earlier thread? I must have missed it. I'll have a dig back through
my mail and see what i can find :)
thanks,
kk

-- 
Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS)
Debian contributor / gNewSense Maintainer
http://www.kgoetz.id.au
No, I won't join your social networking group
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/fhs-discuss/attachments/20110509/dbfc08db/attachment.pgp