[fhs-discuss] /run ins FHS?

Karel Zak kzak at redhat.com
Mon May 9 13:48:38 PDT 2011


On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 09:22:47AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> I think it makes sense to require applications to not assume that the
> contents are persistent across reboots. 

 Exactly.

> This does not tie the hands of
> distributions, but require that using a tmpfs (or similar) will work.

 The FS type is implementation detail and this detail should not be in
 the standard.

 /run is good idea. So, +1 

    Karel

-- 
 Karel Zak  <kzak at redhat.com>
 http://karelzak.blogspot.com


More information about the fhs-discuss mailing list