[fhs-discuss] /run ins FHS?
Karel Zak
kzak at redhat.com
Mon May 9 13:48:38 PDT 2011
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 09:22:47AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> I think it makes sense to require applications to not assume that the
> contents are persistent across reboots.
Exactly.
> This does not tie the hands of
> distributions, but require that using a tmpfs (or similar) will work.
The FS type is implementation detail and this detail should not be in
the standard.
/run is good idea. So, +1
Karel
--
Karel Zak <kzak at redhat.com>
http://karelzak.blogspot.com
More information about the fhs-discuss
mailing list