[fhs-discuss] FHS/LSB Updates
Steve Langasek
vorlon at debian.org
Wed Nov 16 22:19:00 UTC 2011
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 08:58:58PM +0100, Bruno Cornec wrote:
> Ingo Schwarze said on Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 08:14:33PM +0100:
> > - While i'm not sure whether there is a standard for cpio(1)
> > except the LSB, i consider a tool people have get used to.
> > I use at about monthly, most often in conjunction with
> > rpm2cpio(1).
> And initrd/initramfs is based on cpio content at least on my Mandriva
> distro.
Yes, because this is the format supported by the kernel.
Changing the LSB to tell vendors they can't rely on the availability of cpio
therefore seems pointless to me.
Bruce, is there a particular reason you expect a system that would otherwise
be LSB-compliant to not have these tools available?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/
slangasek at ubuntu.com vorlon at debian.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 828 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/fhs-discuss/attachments/20111116/1abd454f/attachment-0001.sig>
More information about the fhs-discuss
mailing list