[Fuego] Functional.LTP failed with "./ltp_target_run.sh not found"

[Liu, Wenlong]

Hi Daniel, Tim,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bird, Timothy [mailto:Tim.Bird at sony.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2017 1:38 PM
> To: Daniel Sangorrin <daniel.sangorrin at toshiba.co.jp>; Liu, Wenlong/刘 文
> 龙 <liuwl.fnst at cn.fujitsu.com>; fuego at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> Subject: RE: [Fuego] Functional.LTP failed with "./ltp_target_run.sh not
> found"
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Daniel Sangorrin on Tuesday, October 10, 2017 10:26 PM
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: fuego-bounces at lists.linuxfoundation.org [mailto:fuego-
> > bounces at lists.linuxfoundation.org] On Behalf Of Liu, Wenlong
> > > Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2017 2:10 PM
> > > To: Bird, Timothy; fuego at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> > > Subject: Re: [Fuego] Functional.LTP failed with "./ltp_target_run.sh
> > > not
> > found"
> > >
> > > Hi Tim,
> > >
> > > > Have you run Functional.LTP with the 'buildonly' spec yet?
> > > > This should deploy the ltp_target_run.sh script to the target.
> > > > Then you can execute other specs.
> > > >
> > > > We should probably put something in the test_pre_check for LTP,
> > > > when "runonly" is true, to check that LTP has previously been
> > > > deployed to the target.  Checking for ltp_target_run.sh might just
> do the trick.
> > > I know what you mean, but the LTP is already installed on my target
> > board(build and deploy are not necessary for me).
> > > The LTP is already installed when the rootfs is made.
> >
> > This works as follows:
> > - buildonly: produces a patched version of LTP, builds it and
> > generates a tar.gz file that you have to install in your target rootfs.
> > - runonly: skips build and deploy, and runs the LTP binaries that you
> > installed on the target rootfs.
> >
> > Non-patched versions of LTP are not supported by the parser.
It seems that only PTS related tests need to be patched. 
It's right?

> 
> That's good to know.  I'll check to see what the patches do, to see if the
> parser could be run in a limited mode with unmodified LTP.
> (Or we would push our patches upstream).
>  -- Tim
> 
>