[Fuego] Functional.LTP failed with "./ltp_target_run.sh not found"

[Daniel Sangorrin]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bird, Timothy [mailto:Tim.Bird at sony.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2017 2:38 PM
> To: Daniel Sangorrin; 'Liu, Wenlong'; fuego at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> Subject: RE: [Fuego] Functional.LTP failed with "./ltp_target_run.sh not found"
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Daniel Sangorrin on Tuesday, October 10, 2017 10:26 PM
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: fuego-bounces at lists.linuxfoundation.org [mailto:fuego-
> > bounces at lists.linuxfoundation.org] On Behalf Of Liu, Wenlong
> > > Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2017 2:10 PM
> > > To: Bird, Timothy; fuego at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> > > Subject: Re: [Fuego] Functional.LTP failed with "./ltp_target_run.sh not
> > found"
> > >
> > > Hi Tim,
> > >
> > > > Have you run Functional.LTP with the 'buildonly' spec yet?
> > > > This should deploy the ltp_target_run.sh script to the target.
> > > > Then you can execute other specs.
> > > >
> > > > We should probably put something in the test_pre_check for LTP, when
> > > > "runonly" is true, to check that LTP has previously been deployed to the
> > > > target.  Checking for ltp_target_run.sh might just do the trick.
> > > I know what you mean, but the LTP is already installed on my target
> > board(build and deploy are not necessary for me).
> > > The LTP is already installed when the rootfs is made.
> >
> > This works as follows:
> > - buildonly: produces a patched version of LTP, builds it and generates a
> > tar.gz file that you have to install in your target rootfs.
> > - runonly: skips build and deploy, and runs the LTP binaries that you installed
> > on the target rootfs.
> >
> > Non-patched versions of LTP are not supported by the parser.
> 
> That's good to know.  I'll check to see what the patches do, to see
> if the parser could be run in a limited mode with unmodified LTP.
> (Or we would push our patches upstream).
>  -- Tim

My intention was to push them upstream, but I didn't have time to cleanup.
The patch was to categorize the open posix test suite results. Actually
the parser code for the open posix test suite is currently commented (see end of parser.py) 

We could support a standard LTP already installed if we don't run the open posix test suite.
We would need to deploy ltp_target_run.sh, as Liu mentions, and also need the skiplist.txt.

Liu: this is just a matter of copy and paste in fuego_test.sh, could you fix it and send a working patch
so we can review it?

Thanks,
Daniel