[Fuego] LTP prechecks
Tim.Bird at sony.com
Wed Jan 31 05:16:01 UTC 2018
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Sangorrin
> Hi Tim,
> I send you a batch of patches that do various prechecks and
> autogenerate a skiplist when you run LTP on a target.
> The list is not exhausitive yet but I'd like to have a first
> review and hopefully have other members contribute with
> their experencies or knowledge.
> [PATCH 01/18] need_check: correct errata
> [PATCH 02/18] need_check: cache the kconfig file
> [PATCH 03/18] need_check: no need for testing if the file exists
> [PATCH 04/18] need_check: check_kconfig should return 1 on first
The above were accepted.
> [PATCH 05/18] LTP: we need root permissions
This one I had a question on - see my email.
> [PATCH 06/18] LTP: patch runtests before running
> [PATCH 07/18] LTP: reduce the time required for two more tests
These two I also had questions on. In principle I like the approach
of getting rid of patches against the LTP source.
But please see my email.
> [PATCH 08/18] LTP: put the skiplist on the log directory
> [PATCH 09/18] LTP: show the generated skiplist file on the jenkins
> [PATCH 10/18] LTP: skip a few problematic tests for now
> [PATCH 11/18] LTP: add tests to skip if tmp is mounted on tmpfs
> [PATCH 12/18] LTP: skip tests that depend on specific kernel commits
> [PATCH 13/18] LTP: skip tests depending on the architecture
> [PATCH 14/18] LTP: skip tests depending on the target kernel config
> [PATCH 15/18] LTP: skip tests that depend on unavailable commands
> [PATCH 16/18] LTP: skip tests depending on the config.h generated by
> [PATCH 17/18] LTP: add note about typical LTP build failure on arm
> [PATCH 18/18] LTP: remove trailing space
I added all these, and will push to my 'master' branch shortly.
I do have a few questions about whether putting some of these skips
into a spec file, that could be customized per board, would be better.
I think I need to play around with it for a while to see if I like this style
of runtime determination of skiplist.
Putting the skiplist in the list of files you can see from the interface is good.
Otherwise users might have a hard time figuring out what a test isn't showing
a status result for a particular run.
Thanks very much.
More information about the Fuego